Twin Paths, Divergent Outcomes: Foreign Aid and the Development Gap between Burundi and Rwanda

이 글은 부룬디와 르완다는 유사한 역사적·구조적 조건에도 불구하고 상이한 발전 경로를 보였으며, 본 연구는 그 원인으로 원조 규모의 차이에 주목한다. 르완다는 더 많은 원조를 바탕으로 재정 역량과 제도를 강화하며 성장 궤도에 진입한 반면, 부룬디는 그렇지 못했다는 점을 보여준다. 이를 통해 ‘대규모 원조 유입 → 재정·제도 강화 → 지속가능한 성장’으로 이어지는 3단계 발전 경로를 제시한다.

Twin Paths, Divergent Outcomes: Foreign Aid and the Development Gap between Burundi and Rwanda

저자: Fabrice Nshimirimana(서울대학교 국제대학원), 김태균(아시아연구소)

Journal of International and Area Studies 32(2), 2025

유사한 출발선에 있던 국가들이 왜 서로 다른 발전 경로를 보이는가?

The development divergence between Burundi and Rwanda, two nations often described as “twin countries,” presents an intriguing case for comparative analysis via the method of difference. While most scholarship attributes Rwanda’s success to its effective institutions and strong leadership, this study introduces an additional and underexplored explanation: the role of aid volumes. Employing pattern matching of a structured, focused comparative case study design and drawing on data from OECD Creditor Reporting System (CRS) and the World Bank’s World Development Indicators (WDI) from 1992 to 2022, this study finds that Rwanda consistently received substantially more aid than Burundi, even when both countries experienced similar post-conflict fragility and institutional weaknesses. The findings align with the big push theory, which posits that large-scale aid is crucial for countries mired in poverty to initiate growth. Building on this, the study proposes a three- stage aid-development pathway: (1) high aid inflows, (2) enhanced fiscal capacity and institutional consolidation for effective governance, and (3) sustainable growth leading to partial aid graduation.

자세히 보기